Evidence can be a tough law school class but it doesn’t have to be. Download a copy of my proven Evidence outline today and you’ll be well on your way to crushing your Evidence exam.
Table of Contents
Ace Your Evidence Exam With My Proven Evidence Outline
You already know how important it is to use a proven Evidence outline to study for your Evidence class, especially during finals.
I aced my Evidence exam by studying smart (not hard) and by creating an actionable outline to use throughout the semester.
My proven Evidence outline consists of two parts. The first part is a comprehensive outline which will serve as a roadmap for your Evidence class. It summarizes all of the law and rules you’ll need to know to ace your Evidence exam.
The second part of my Evidence outline is what I call an “attack outline.” This is a condensed Evidence checklist that will guide you through even the most difficult exam questions.
You can now get my Evidence outline as a printable PDF e-book for just $4.99. That’s cheaper than two cups of your morning Starbucks coffee.
Invest in your law school career by making your Evidence class a lot easier. Get your copy of my Evidence outline today because I’ll stop selling it soon.
Payments are securely processed through Paypal but you don’t need a Paypal account to purchase. Just click the “Get The Evidence PDF” button and select the “Pay with Debit or Credit Card” option. Your PDF will then be available to download instantly.
Still not convinced? Then go ahead and save this free “attack outline.” It’s the same one I created and used to ace my Evidence exam.
I’m giving away my Evidence attack outline to you for free because I truly want you to crush your Evidence exam.
Evidence Attack Outline
- Specialized relevance rules?
- Is it character evidence?
- 404(b) route around propensity box/
- 404(a)(1) Character of Accused?
- 404(a)(2) Character of Victim? Rape shield law?
- 405(b) Specific instance of conduct as essential element?
- 413-415 Sexual assault?
- Non character based? (contradiction, past inconsistent statement, bias)
- Character based?
- 608(a) Character of truthfulness – opinion/rep
- 608(b) Specific acts on cross bearing on truthfulness?
- 609(a)(1) conviction > 1 year bearing on truthfulness?
- 609(a)(2) any conviction w/element based on untruthfulness?
- 609(b) Less than 10 years?
- Is it an assertion?
- Offered to prove the truth?
- Effect on person?
- Verbal act?
- More than one level of hearsay?
- Exception to hearsay?
- 807 catch all?
- Crim/Civil? (Confrontation clause; Testimonial?)
Exceptions To Hearsay
801 – Declarant testifies at trial, subject to cross, AND
- Prior inconsistent statement under oath offered substantively
- Prior consistent statement offered in rebuttal
- Prior identification
801 – Statement by party opponent offered against him, AND
- Party’s own words
- Adoptive admission
- Co-conspirator statement
- Statement of agents
803 – Availability of declarant immaterial, AND
- Present sense impression
- Excited utterance
- Statement of then existing condition
- Medical diagnosis
- Recorded recollection (writing used to refresh memory)
- Business records (absence of business records)
- Public records (absence of public records)
- Ancient documents
804 – Declarant unable to testify, AND
- Former sworn testimony
- Statement against interest
- Dying declarations
- Forfeiture by wrongdoing
807 – Catch All
- Reliability and trustworthiness
P.S. Don’t forget to download the full, 14-page version of my Evidence outline for just $4.99.